Tab. 5.2 Drinking water quality in public water supplies of cities under Monitoring System, 1994 - 1999

City

Excess of NMH + MHPR [%]

Excess of MH [%]

Excess of DH + IH [%]

Max

Min

Correlation

Max

Min

Correlation

Max

Min

Correlation

Benešov

0.55

0.00

-

4.70

0.84

-

4.91

3.34

n

Brno

0.15

0.01

-

4.98

1.10

-

7.86

5.84

n

České Budějovice

0.33

0.00

n

4.43

1.07

n

1.20

0.14

-

Děčín

2.92

0.00

-

5.36

1.87

+

10.22

5.61

+

Havlíčkův Brod

1.00

0.04

n

4.27

0.85

-

5.90

4.46

n

Hodonín

0.22

0.00

-

4.10

0.89

-

4.93

3.75

n

Hradec Králové

0.48

0.00

-

7.11

2.39

n

12.20

5.85

+

Jablonec n/N

1.08

0.05

-

6.43

1.25

-

8.85

4.63

n

Jihlava

0.34

0.02

n

5.57

1.58

n

9.30

5.83

n

Jindřichův Hradec

0.21

0.00

n

5.73

0.42

-

4.99

0.67

n

Karviná

0.35

0.00

n

4.50

0.73

-

9.93

6.46

n

Kladno

0.48

0.00

n

2.06

1.28

n

2.49

0.63

n

Klatovy

0.95

0.16

-

3.29

0.49

n

6.40

1.81

n

Kolín

1.16

0.17

n

4.49

0.84

n

3.81

1.77

+

Kroměříž

1.20

0.00

n

2.14

0.00

n

2.10

0.00

n

Liberec

0.45

0.15

-

3.30

0.54

n

4.83

2.15

n

Litoměřice

0.53

0.13

-

4.44

0.38

-

1.57

0.18

+

Mělník

0.48

0.00

n

2.30

1.39

n

3.66

0.51

n

Most

0.16

0.04

n

2.82

0.51

n

5.86

2.41

-

Olomouc

0.20

0.00

n

5.59

0.41

-

5.36

2.89

n

Ostrava

0.34

0.05

n

6.32

1.17

n

6.75

3.16

n

Plzeň

1.49

0.00

n

7.02

1.20

-

6.97

5.14

n

Prague

0.07

0.00

-

1.83

0.22

n

1.92

0.59

n

Příbram

0.82

0.00

n

8.97

1.97

n

8.02

3.36

n

Sokolov

1.00

0.36

n

5.43

2.83

-

10.01

6.91

n

Svitavy

1.51

0.23

n

7.81

4.30

n

9.12

3.17

n

Šumperk

1.57

0.32

-

2.68

0.38

-

9.77

7.73

n

Ústí n/L

0.56

0.14

n

2.79

1.16

n

6.69

2.43

+

Ústí n/O

0.58

0.12

-

1.82

1.15

+

7.24

5.17

+

Znojmo

1.08

0.00

-

4.34

2.17

n

7.75

4.69

n

Žďár n/S

0.27

0.00

n

6.65

0.28

-

8.98

5.37

n

Remark:

Max. Min - maximal and minimal value of limit excess in 1994 - 1999 years
“+” - statistically meaningful increase
“-” - statistically meaningful decrease
0” - excess of limit value was not found in a period under monitoring
n” - correlation was not found, random distribution of values in monitoring period
“++” and “--” resp. mean repetitional correlation, i. e. for evaluation in 1998 and 1999 years
MH - limit value, MHPR - MH of reference risk, NMH - maximal MH, IH - indicative value, DH - recommended value